sign up to receive emails from thenew dentist

    • Home
    • Featured Profiles
    • Clinical
    • Business
    • Photography
    • Culture
    • The Best

    Sign up to receive emails from thenew.dentist

    content

    You have Successfully Subscribed!

    • Home
    • Featured Profiles
    • Clinical
    • Business
    • Photography
    • Culture
    • The Best
    Image
    “Pre-operative root length estimates represent a predictable method for identifying unrecognized challenges that may affect case selection.”
     
    Better Estimates, Better Results: Part 1
    by William J. Nudera DDS, MS

    Share this Post

    An estimate is nothing more than a prediction. It is an approximation or projection of something based on experience and/or available information, with the understanding that all the facts remain uncertain. Depending on the content, an estimate can be leveraged to address multiple goals. In the context of endodontics, that leverage comes in the form of digital radiography.

    Two-dimensional radiography represents the current standard of care with respect to pre-operative imaging for endodontic purposes. Although cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) is making its way into the pre-operative endodontic arena, this article focuses on two-dimensional digital radiography as the primary tool for making measurement estimates.

    Clinicians should take three pre-operative radiographs for endodontic cases: a straight periapical radiograph, a “cone shifted” periapical radiograph (a radiograph angled 10 to 30 degrees to the mesial or distal) and a bitewing radiograph. Proper image capturing techniques are required to minimize the additional distortion effects of foreshortening and/or elongation. I suggest using an extension cone paralleling device (XCP) (Fig. 1). The images can be used in conjunction with the calibrated digital ruler interface found in most digital radiography software programs.

    The Predictive Value of Root Length Estimates

    Extensive study of root anatomy and morphology over the decades has provided calculated weighted averages with respect to root length for each tooth in the human dentition as well as each root per tooth. These statistics can be found in most endodontic texts. Averages have value in regards to the anatomical characteristics of a general population, but hold little value for individual patients who require endodontic treatment. Pre-operative root length estimates can be a useful tool when evaluating case difficulty and case selection.

    Pre-operative root length is estimated by measuring the distance from the highest point of the occlusal table to the apex of the root being measured. These measurements should be made from the straight periapical radiograph. In multi-rooted teeth, the occlusal table reference point may be different, depending on the location of the root being measured. Often, roots exhibit a degree of curvature, making it difficult to obtain an accurate estimate with a straight measuring tool. If available, I suggest using a multi-angle or polyline ruler function.

    It is every clinician’s responsibility to understand individual limitations with respect to case selection. In my experience, the most manageable cases fall within an estimated length range of 17 mm to 21 mm. This length range encompasses the majority of teeth that require treatment. Estimated root lengths within this range allow for convenient use of the electronic apex locator (EAL), the consistent establishment of reproducible reference points, and proper management of length control during instrumentation. Additional factors that may influence case selection should be considered with estimated root lengths of less than 16 mm and/or greater than 21 mm.

    Estimated Root Lengths of 16 mm or Less

    The greatest challenge with root lengths of 16 mm or less lies with establishing and maintaining accurate working lengths. Many commonly used endodontic files are manufactured with 16 mm of working flutes, generally referred to as the “working portion” of the file (Fig. 2). All working portions are manufactured with a rate of taper, which is the change in file diameter over its length. Silicone file stoppers, used to establish and maintain working length, are manufactured to fit snuggly on the non-working portion of the file, corresponding to its largest diameter. When the stopper is positioned on an area of decreased file diameter, the result is a loose fitting file stopper (Fig. 3).

    Excessive stopper movement can create inaccuracies when attempting to establish reproducible reference points as well as when measuring the file against an endodontic ruler. Additionally, a loose fitting stopper on an engine driven instrument can give the illusion of proper length control while the file continues advancing apically, leading to over-instrumentation. The shorter the estimated working length, the more dramatic this effect becomes. While this observation may not hold true for every manufactured file, it must be taken into consideration. Recognizing this relationship can improve the odds of proper canal management, but may impact the degree of case difficulty.

    Estimated Root Lengths Greater Than 21 mm

    Root lengths estimated to exceed 21 mm can impact case difficulty by limiting the clinician to 25 mm files. This may not pose a problem when treating teeth positioned more anterior and/or teeth on patients with an adequate range of joint motion, but when access to a tooth is limited, restrictions on file length options must be taken into consideration when evaluating overall case difficulty.

    Estimated Root Lengths Greater Than 23 mm

    In addition to the limitations mentioned above, estimated root lengths exceeding 23 mm can pose a challenge to using EALs. EALs require available file space above the silicone stopper and below the handle to securely attach the file clip. The available file space required for most EAL file clips is approximately 1.5 mm. When using 25 mm files, the silicone stopper’s position can encroach upon this required file space, impacting the clinician’s ability to predictably secure the file clip and establish an accurate working length.

    In this situation, the clinician can choose to use a “long file extender” (Fig. 4), which requires less available file space and/or use 31 mm files. If the latter is chosen, using longer files may not pose an issue unless other limitations are also present, such as limited patient opening and/or the position of the tooth within the arch.

    Conclusion

    As clinicians, we have the autonomy to perform any treatment that is deemed to fall within our scope of practice. We also are encouraged to push those boundaries with the intent of expanding that scope. Pre-operative root length estimates represent a predictable method for identifying unrecognized challenges that may affect case selection.

    Look for part two of this article in the next issue!

    About the Author

    Dr. William Nudera earned a DDS from the University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Dentistry in 1999. Upon graduation, he served in the United States Air Force Dental Corps where he completed a one year AEGD residency program. During his time of service, Dr. Nudera received a National Defense Service Medal for his involvement in “Operation Enduring Freedom” and was awarded the title of “Air Force Dental Office of the Year” in 2002. Following his service, Dr. Nudera returned to Chicago where he continued to practice general dentistry while pursuing an education in endodontics at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Dr. Nudera completed his endodontic training in 2005, earning his Endodontic specialty certificate as well as a Master’s Degree in Oral Sciences.

    Dr. Nudera maintains a full-time private practice limited to endodontics at Specialized Endodontic Solutions in Bloomingdale, Illinois, and downtown Chicago at Advanced Endodontics of Chicago. Dr. Nudera currently holds a faculty position in the Department of Endodontics at the University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Dentistry.

    Image
    Follow us

    You have Successfully Subscribed!

    Dental Insurance Guy
    Business

    Why Do We Deal with Insurance?

    Dr. Travis Campbell

    Are you ready to significantly reduce your dental insurance frustrations?  Would you like to achieve higher reimbursements, fewer denials, and happier patients?...

    Read More →
    Clinical

    Think Like an Endodontist and “ReThink” Your Approach to Endodontics

    William J. Nudera, DDS, MS

    NuEndo ReThinking Endodontics, is the first of its kind resource that uses easy-to-follow systems designed to simplify the complex process of endodontic diagnosis and case selection. The guide leads you through a series of well-organized,...

    Read More →
    Culture

    For The Love Of The Game: Dr. Jeff Gray, Espire Dental, San Diego

    Dr. Gray has had an amazing career that’s included forming a foundation that’s raised millions for children’s charities and partnering with one of his musical heroes, Garth Brooks, on another—and it all ties back to his love for baseball....

    Read More →
    Business

    GPs & Specialists: Strengthen Your Relationship

    Dr. Travis Campbell

    The relationship between a specialist and GP can be amazingly positive or incredibly tense depending on how it is managed and the communication between parties. Communication is a two-way street, and both sides can and do fail....

    Read More →
    March 7, 2022

    Extreme Hobby: Competitive Kayaking With Dr. Istvan Urban

    Culture

    Dr. Urban’s love of nature and adventure have kept him kayaking since he was 11 years old....

    No comment0
    Business

    Is Dentistry’s Holy Trinity Enough?

    Dr. Robert Martino

    “If you brush, floss and come see us twice a year everything is going to be alright” is a dental sin. You may be a non-believer, but statistics prove me right. 47.2% of all adults have some form of periodontal disease....

    Read More →
    February 3, 2022

    Burnout in Dentistry: Real or Fiction?

    Culture

    Do you ever find yourself coming home exhausted, both mentally and physically? Have you ever wished it was Friday, only to realize that you only just finished Monday? Do you have multiple days where you are anxious or just don’t want...

    No comment0
    Profile

    Dr. Maria Lopez Howell, P-I Brånemark Award for Lifetime Achievement Recipient

    Though it wasn’t always easy, Dr. Maria Lopez Howell has achieved many firsts as a woman dentist throughout her career—paving the way for other women to enjoy rewarding careers in the profession....

    Read More →
    The Best

    Best Looking Dental Office 2021: Celestial Dental, Rochester, New York

    Dr. Antonio Calascibetta combined his love for astronomy and dentistry in this space-themed practice....

    Read More →
    December 1, 2021

    H20: Vertical or horizontal with Dr. Taite Anderson

    Culture

    Frozen or liquid. Fresh or salt. Warm or cold. Dr. Taite Anderson’s favorite hobby is water....

    No comment0
    Business

    Do you know Lou?

    Dr. Lou Berman is shaking up the dental instrument market, offering dentists high-quality products for a fraction of what other companies charge....

    Read More →
    Business

    Insurance Discount Plans: Good, Bad or Ugly?

    Dr. Travis Campbell

    The mere mention of dental insurance discount plans tends to elicit an immediate frown of dislike from many dentists. The sentiment which quickly comes to mind is “Why are we giving these patients a discount if insurance isn’t paying for anything...

    Read More →
    • terms of use
    • privacy

    Image
    Image
    Better Estimates, Better Results: Part 1
    by William J. Nudera DDS, MS

    An estimate is nothing more than a prediction. It is an approximation or projection of something based on experience and/or available information, with the understanding that all the facts remain uncertain. Depending on the content, an estimate can be leveraged to address multiple goals. In the context of endodontics, that leverage comes in the form of digital radiography.

    Two-dimensional radiography represents the current standard of care with respect to pre-operative imaging for endodontic purposes. Although cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) is making its way into the pre-operative endodontic arena, this article focuses on two-dimensional digital radiography as the primary tool for making measurement estimates.

    Clinicians should take three pre-operative radiographs for endodontic cases: a straight periapical radiograph, a “cone shifted” periapical radiograph (a radiograph angled 10 to 30 degrees to the mesial or distal) and a bitewing radiograph. Proper image capturing techniques are required to minimize the additional distortion effects of foreshortening and/or elongation. I suggest using an extension cone paralleling device (XCP) (Fig. 1). The images can be used in conjunction with the calibrated digital ruler interface found in most digital radiography software programs.

    The Predictive Value of Root Length Estimates

    Extensive study of root anatomy and morphology over the decades has provided calculated weighted averages with respect to root length for each tooth in the human dentition as well as each root per tooth. These statistics can be found in most endodontic texts. Averages have value in regards to the anatomical characteristics of a general population, but hold little value for individual patients who require endodontic treatment. Pre-operative root length estimates can be a useful tool when evaluating case difficulty and case selection.

    Pre-operative root length is estimated by measuring the distance from the highest point of the occlusal table to the apex of the root being measured. These measurements should be made from the straight periapical radiograph. In multi-rooted teeth, the occlusal table reference point may be different, depending on the location of the root being measured. Often, roots exhibit a degree of curvature, making it difficult to obtain an accurate estimate with a straight measuring tool. If available, I suggest using a multi-angle or polyline ruler function.

    It is every clinician’s responsibility to understand individual limitations with respect to case selection. In my experience, the most manageable cases fall within an estimated length range of 17 mm to 21 mm. This length range encompasses the majority of teeth that require treatment. Estimated root lengths within this range allow for convenient use of the electronic apex locator (EAL), the consistent establishment of reproducible reference points, and proper management of length control during instrumentation. Additional factors that may influence case selection should be considered with estimated root lengths of less than 16 mm and/or greater than 21 mm.

    Estimated Root Lengths of 16 mm or Less

    The greatest challenge with root lengths of 16 mm or less lies with establishing and maintaining accurate working lengths. Many commonly used endodontic files are manufactured with 16 mm of working flutes, generally referred to as the “working portion” of the file (Fig. 2). All working portions are manufactured with a rate of taper, which is the change in file diameter over its length. Silicone file stoppers, used to establish and maintain working length, are manufactured to fit snuggly on the non-working portion of the file, corresponding to its largest diameter. When the stopper is positioned on an area of decreased file diameter, the result is a loose fitting file stopper (Fig. 3).

    Excessive stopper movement can create inaccuracies when attempting to establish reproducible reference points as well as when measuring the file against an endodontic ruler. Additionally, a loose fitting stopper on an engine driven instrument can give the illusion of proper length control while the file continues advancing apically, leading to over-instrumentation. The shorter the estimated working length, the more dramatic this effect becomes. While this observation may not hold true for every manufactured file, it must be taken into consideration. Recognizing this relationship can improve the odds of proper canal management, but may impact the degree of case difficulty.

    Estimated Root Lengths Greater Than 21 mm

    Root lengths estimated to exceed 21 mm can impact case difficulty by limiting the clinician to 25 mm files. This may not pose a problem when treating teeth positioned more anterior and/or teeth on patients with an adequate range of joint motion, but when access to a tooth is limited, restrictions on file length options must be taken into consideration when evaluating overall case difficulty.

    Estimated Root Lengths Greater Than 23 mm

    In addition to the limitations mentioned above, estimated root lengths exceeding 23 mm can pose a challenge to using EALs. EALs require available file space above the silicone stopper and below the handle to securely attach the file clip. The available file space required for most EAL file clips is approximately 1.5 mm. When using 25 mm files, the silicone stopper’s position can encroach upon this required file space, impacting the clinician’s ability to predictably secure the file clip and establish an accurate working length.

    In this situation, the clinician can choose to use a “long file extender” (Fig. 4), which requires less available file space and/or use 31 mm files. If the latter is chosen, using longer files may not pose an issue unless other limitations are also present, such as limited patient opening and/or the position of the tooth within the arch.

    Conclusion

    As clinicians, we have the autonomy to perform any treatment that is deemed to fall within our scope of practice. We also are encouraged to push those boundaries with the intent of expanding that scope. Pre-operative root length estimates represent a predictable method for identifying unrecognized challenges that may affect case selection.

    Look for part two of this article in the next issue!

    About the Author

    Dr. William Nudera earned a DDS from the University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Dentistry in 1999. Upon graduation, he served in the United States Air Force Dental Corps where he completed a one year AEGD residency program. During his time of service, Dr. Nudera received a National Defense Service Medal for his involvement in “Operation Enduring Freedom” and was awarded the title of “Air Force Dental Office of the Year” in 2002. Following his service, Dr. Nudera returned to Chicago where he continued to practice general dentistry while pursuing an education in endodontics at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Dr. Nudera completed his endodontic training in 2005, earning his Endodontic specialty certificate as well as a Master’s Degree in Oral Sciences.

    Dr. Nudera maintains a full-time private practice limited to endodontics at Specialized Endodontic Solutions in Bloomingdale, Illinois, and downtown Chicago at Advanced Endodontics of Chicago. Dr. Nudera currently holds a faculty position in the Department of Endodontics at the University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Dentistry.

     

    You have Successfully Subscribed!

    Follow us

    Dental Insurance Guy
    Business

    Why Do We Deal with Insurance?

    Dr. Travis Campbell

    Are you ready to significantly reduce your dental insurance frustrations?  Would you like to achieve higher reimbursements, fewer denials, and happier patients?...

    Read More →
    Clinical

    Think Like an Endodontist and “ReThink” Your Approach to Endodontics

    William J. Nudera, DDS, MS

    NuEndo ReThinking Endodontics, is the first of its kind resource that uses easy-to-follow systems designed to simplify the complex process of endodontic diagnosis and case selection. The guide leads you through a series of well-organized,...

    Read More →
    Business

    GPs & Specialists: Strengthen Your Relationship

    Dr. Travis Campbell

    The relationship between a specialist and GP can be amazingly positive or incredibly tense depending on how it is managed and the communication between parties. Communication is a two-way street, and both sides can and do fail....

    Read More →
    Sponsored Advertisement

    Rethinking Endodontics!

    For the general dentist and the experienced endodontist alike, this book is a guide and a reference tool for the complex processes of endodontic diagnosis, prognosis, and case selection. Understand the dynamics of the pulpal-dentin complex, the underlying conditions related to pulpal and periapical disease, and the methods surrounding its...

    View More →
    Image
    • terms of use
    • privacy
    • terms of use
    • privacy
    Image
    • Home
    • Featured Profiles
    • Clinical
    • Business
    • Photography
    • Culture
    • The Best